Modi's popularity is a well-known secret: Ram Madhav, RSS
15 Jul, 2013, 0514 hrs IST, Amita Shah, ET Bureau
Contrary
to perception in sections of the media and the public, the RSS doesn’t
permit its office-bearers to get directly involved in electioneering.
In an interview with ET, Ram Madhav, leader of RSS, talks about the
organizational structure of BJP and RSS, and maintains that the two are
independent of each other. Excerpts:
There is no truth in these allegations of micromanagement. We
don't even macro-manage the affairs of the BJP for the simple, yet most
important, reason that the swayamsevaks of the RSS
working in the BJP are capable of handling their affairs and we have
full faith in them. The Sangh and the BJP share an ideological
relationship. We also share human resources occasionally. But
organisationally, both entities are independent of each other. None
interferes in the day-to-day affairs of the other.
Narendra
Modi's recent interview to a foreign news agency triggered a
controversy over his remarks on being a Hindu nationalist and on the
2002 Gujarat riots...
A controversy was sought to be created where it didn't exist.
Does the Sangh feel that Modi's projection as the prime ministerial candidate will bring electoral dividends to the BJP?
The BJP leadership is the best judge of what brings electoral
dividends to them. We believe that they take an appropriate decision
after due consultation within. We also believe that whatever they decide
must be in their interest. We don't interfere in or influence their
decision-making ...That he is popular is a 'secret' well known.
Are Modi's critics right when they say that his candidature will polarise the electorate?
The BJP leadership knows better about these matters.
But the Congress says the BJP is working as a call centre of RSS to hard sell 'product' Narendra Modi ahead of the 2014 elections...
In politics, parties indulge in such allegations and
counter-allegations . Some of them will be out of frustration and hence
ridiculous. The Sangh doesn't like to get involved in this political
sparring.
Senior BJP leader LK Advani is reportedly unhappy with the Sangh's pointsman in the BJP. Is that true?
Shri Lal Krishna Advani
ji is a senior and respected leader. His views are always taken
seriously . We have no knowledge of the authenticity of the reports
being referred to about Advaniji's unhappiness with any RSS functionary.
What was the message for the BJP from the Sangh's recent meeting in Amravati?
Amravati meetings are an annual review exercise that happens
after the training programmes are completed. We review the participation
in our training programme and plan for the activity and campaigns in
the coming months. The message is only for the Sangh functionaries.
What will be the Sangh's role as the BJP gears up for elections — to the state assembles as well as the Lok Sabha?
The RSS doesn't play any role in elections. Contrary to
perception in sections of the media and the public, the RSS doesn't
permit its office-bearers to get directly involved in electioneering at
any level. However, we certainly ask our swayamsevaks to actively
participate in the election process as enlightened citizens. We expect
them to encourage other citizens to utilise their democratic right of
vote and ensure that maximum voting takes place in their respective
areas.
What will be the role of the Sangh's various offshoots in the elections?
They will encourage their ordinary members to actively play
the role of enlightened citizens who have the good of the country at
heart. Like the BJP, these outfits are otherwise independent
organisations and, hence, the Sangh doesn't give any directive to them
about the elections.
When Advani went to Pakistan and wrote a remark on the visitors page in Jinna's memorial (as any foriegner does in Rajghat in India) that Jinna was secular and Pakistan didnot develope to his ideals, anti-Hindu anti-India journalist took it as a weapon to beat Advani and BJP and VHP. VHP, thoughtlessly (they cand do so)instead of enquiring to the details asked Advani to apologise. Even RSS HQ criticised Advani on that. In a memorial, whoever that person is, we wouldnt write anything bad. The only good thing about Jinna, that Advani could find was that he was not a fundamentalist Muslim and to that extent he was secular( the real meaning of secularism is not sarvadharmasamabhaav, that is hindu interpretation; english meaning of secular is "not related to religion"). And thought Jinna used religion for political milage, he wasnot a fundamenalist Muslim, everyone knows. What was the urgency in demanding apology from Advani? That would have deeply hurt the person who submitted his fine brain for the sangh ideology. His present resentment is condemnable. But the basic reason for that was the insult he received from Sangh. We, the swayamsevaks can only blame it as our fate. Had Rajiv Gandhi not been assassinated India's picture would have been different without BJP having been forced to be partner in VP Sing ministry. Like that another hard luck.
This blog is very informative to get updated news and to get live Stock Tips visit Epic Research which provides trading tips and daily market updates for the share market.
I am very much pleased with the contents you have mentioned. I wanted to thank you for this great article. I enjoyed every little bit part of it and I will be waiting for the new updates. Top 10 advisory firm in Indore
I admire the valuable advice you make available in your expertly written content. I want to thank you for this informative read; I really appreciate sharing this great. Invest India Fin Serve
When Advani went to Pakistan and wrote a remark on the visitors page in Jinna's memorial (as any foriegner does in Rajghat in India) that Jinna was secular and Pakistan didnot develope to his ideals, anti-Hindu anti-India journalist took it as a weapon to beat Advani and BJP and VHP. VHP, thoughtlessly (they cand do so)instead of enquiring to the details asked Advani to apologise. Even RSS HQ criticised Advani on that. In a memorial, whoever that person is, we wouldnt write anything bad. The only good thing about Jinna, that Advani could find was that he was not a fundamentalist Muslim and to that extent he was secular( the real meaning of secularism is not sarvadharmasamabhaav, that is hindu interpretation; english meaning of secular is "not related to religion"). And thought Jinna used religion for political milage, he wasnot a fundamenalist Muslim, everyone knows. What was the urgency in demanding apology from Advani? That would have deeply hurt the person who submitted his fine brain for the sangh ideology. His present resentment is condemnable. But the basic reason for that was the insult he received from Sangh. We, the swayamsevaks can only blame it as our fate. Had Rajiv Gandhi not been assassinated India's picture would have been different without BJP having been forced to be partner in VP Sing ministry. Like that another hard luck.
ReplyDeleteThis blog is very informative to get updated news and to get live Stock Tips visit Epic Research which provides trading tips and daily market updates for the share market.
ReplyDeleteI am very much pleased with the contents you have mentioned. I wanted to thank you for this great article. I enjoyed every little bit part of it and I will be waiting for the new updates.
ReplyDeleteTop 10 advisory firm in Indore
I admire the valuable advice you make available in your expertly written content. I want to thank you for this informative read; I really appreciate sharing this great.
ReplyDeleteInvest India Fin Serve